This from the article: “he was deeply troubled by what he interpreted as an attempt by the president to subvert U.S. foreign policy…” There is a huge fallacy in this. Anyone know what it is? https://t.co/L1Jfgck6G2
— Brit Hume (@brithume) November 2, 2019
It’s the same problem that the two former CIA Directors had here. Neither they nor Vindman get to decide foreign policy. And they for sure don’t get to take out a president because they disagree with his foreign policy.