No bias, nothing to see here.

Via Free Beacon:

The New York Times employed dramatically different headlines for similar Supreme Court confirmation hearing answers from Elena Kagan in 2010 and Judge Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday.

Then the solicitor general nominated to the Supreme Court by President Barack Obama, Kagan’s caginess on questions about her own views was covered with the headline, “Kagan Follows Precedent by Offering Few Opinions.” For Kavanaugh, asked about his views on whether President Donald Trump could be subpoenaed or if he could subvert the Russia investigation, the Times wrote, “Kavanaugh Ducks Questions on Presidential Powers and Subpoenas.”

White House spokesman Raj Shah wrote, “Double standard anyone?” in an email blasting the differences.

Keep reading…

17 Shares