OPM should have bigger fish to fry first.
Via Military Com:
Troops with security clearances who have low credit scores or past-due bills could be at greater risk of having those clearances revoked, thanks to a change to the frequency at which background check officials look at financial data.
“The Department of Defense (DoD) will now ‘continuously’ monitor the financial status of servicemembers with security clearances,” the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced in an Aug. 20 release. “This means that a past-due bill or an error on your credit report could jeopardize your clearance status.”
Currently, background check reviews for clearance holders look at credit and financial data of clearance holders once every five to 10 years, the release says.
But a change directed by the White House earlier this year shifts the administration of background checks from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to the Pentagon, and with that comes the new automated monitoring plan, officials said.
“This new process might impact your DoD security clearance and prevent you from being deemed ‘deployable,’ which could greatly impact your military career unless you can prove to DoD that you were the victim of identity theft, fraud or a mistake, and that you’re currently living within your means and are making a good-faith effort to resolve your unpaid debts,” the CFPB release warned.
Pentagon officials did not respond to a request for clarification on how much a service member must be in debt or how low a credit score must be before a clearance is revoked or what troops who believe they could be impacted should do to address the problem.
Financial stability is just of one of many risk factors investigators considered when determining whether or not troops and other employees can hold or keep a security clearance, according to the National Security Adjudicative Guidelines, last updated in July, 2017.
“Failure to live within one’s means, satisfy debts, and meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgement, or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an individual’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified or sensitive information,” the guidelines say.
Other facets considered by investigators include sexual behavior, alcohol consumption and personal conduct, according to the guidelines.