So liberals believe Hillary should have won because she won the popular vote because that’s democracy. But failing that they want 37 electors to disregard the millions of people they represent. Something sounds inconsistent there, as Tucker Carlson nicely brings out.

Mike Farrell tries to pitch the illusion of John Kasich as a ‘reasonable’ alternative to Trump. The only way that would happen is if you flipped over 270 electors to vote for him, which isn’t going to happen. Even if you deprived Trump of 270, it would still be thrown to the House, where you could only vote for the top three candidates who received electoral votes. Since there are only 2, Clinton and Trump, you could not vote for any other candidate, Kasich included. So for whom does he think the GOP controlled House is going to vote?

HT: Twitchy