Screen Shot 2016-08-18 at 10.01.37 PM

I’m confused. Hillary told us that there was nothing marked classified. So the leak now of anything she might have said about this info couldn’t be classified, right? Otherwise, she’d be lying, and that can’t be…

Via NY Post:

All leaks of classified information are not created equal — at least not for top officials running Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Some of the same staffers who were apparently nonchalant about their boss sending classified information over her private email server are now irate over the possible leak of Clinton’s FBI interview to reporters.

“Already hearing from people who have been contacted by reporters with knowledge of the content of their interviews in FBI 302’s,” campaign chair John Podesta said Wednesday night on Twitter.

A 302 is an interview summary produced by FBI agents. Podesta’s claim is that the FBI’s interview summary of the one they conducted with Hillary Clinton — which they shipped this week to Capitol Hill — has already been leaking to the press.

“Tough protocols on access to FBI’s 302’s must have included Republican speed dial to reporters,” Podesta added on Twitter.

The Clinton campaign communications director, Jennifer Palmieri, scolded: “Would remind all that this material is classified. So this is leaking of classified material.”

The officials, though, didn’t seem so concerned about the safeguarding of classified information when it was housed on a private server owned by their boss, Clinton.

Indeed, Palmieri denied it even existed. “Hillary didn’t send any classified materials over email: Hillary only used her personal account for unclassified email,” Palmieri claimed in a blog post more than a year ago.

Keep reading…

47 Shares