It’s almost like they are substituting “sexist” for “racist” when talking about Hillary Clinton instead of Obama.
Via Noah Rothman:
Following the publication of documents relating to how former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton comported herself politically in the Washington Free Beacon, a CNN panel took on those revelations and their possible political implications. The panel also took on Sen. Rand Paul’s (R-KY) attacks on Bill Clinton’s sexual exploits and the revelations contained in the documents relating to Clinton. Most of the members of the CNN panel concluded that Clinton is aided by how the media is portraying her. […]
Moving on to the documents about Hillary Clinton portraying her as a “ruthless” operative, Cain said the revelations were important because this behavior could manifest itself in a potential Clinton presidency.
“If those terms were used to describe a man,” Pereira countered, “People would say –- would likely say –- those are laudable qualities.”
“If gender were flipped, it would be very different,” Henican added. “The reason not to talk about, it is old, it’s icky, and it’s none of our business.”