You have been warned.

Via Weekly Standard:

Yesterday, I asked Senator Dick Durbin if he thinks Obamacare’s contraception/abortifacient mandate still violates the religious liberty of Catholic churches, like the Archdiocese of Washington. Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, said he didn’t know. But Durbin said he did know one thing: The bill being offered in the Senate by Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri (and co-sponsored by Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska) to protect religious liberty and rights of conscience from Obamacare goes too far.

“The Blunt approach is, I think, entirely overreaching,” Durbin said. “You know, a Christian Science owner of a running shoe store could decide no health insurance.”

“Wasn’t that the law prior to the health care bill?” I asked.

Durbin didn’t reply and walked away.

. . . But there are a few things Democrats never mention when they raise these frightening hypothetical scenarios. First, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act applies solely to Obamacare. It would merely restore conscience protections that Americans had prior to its passage. It does not affect any other state or federal regulations.

Can Democrats cite real examples of Christian businessmen denying AIDS treatment or screenings prior to Obamacare’s passage? No, they can’t. Because that never happened.

Keep reading…

0 Shares