That will send a message. (Sarcasm)
A jury in Virginia had to convict a maid for felony grand larceny after she stole $5,000 worth of rings from the home she cleaned- but felt badly for the pregnant 19-year-old, so they paid her fine for her.
Jury foreman Jeffery Memmott says they pooled together $80 for Sandra Mendez Ortega, who is pregnant with her second child, after they convicted her. But while the story seems sweet- the victim, Lisa Copeland, is outraged.
‘I just pray that they’re never in my shoes,’ Copeland told the Washington Post. She also says Ortega never accepted responsibility for the theft. ‘If she had accepted accountability, I would be okay with all of this. The fact that she won’t accept accountability makes it wrong.’
Copeland was also angered by the paltry $60 fine, which equated to one day of services as a maid, and that Ortega made off $20 richer.
‘I was outraged,’ Copeland said. ‘I was just flabbergasted. I didn’t think $60 equated to the crime at all.’
One juror knew that ‘Justice had to be done.’ But the juror, Janice Woolridge said, ‘there’s also got be some compassion somewhere. Young people make bad decisions. We just couldn’t pile on any more.’
‘The general sentiment was she was a victim, too,’ Memmott said. ‘Two of the women [jurors] were crying because of how bad they felt. One lady pulled out a $20 bill, and just about everybody chipped in.'[…]
Copeland says it was not revealed to the benevolent jury that Ortega is in America illegally.
Copeland says she was told her citizen status was not relevant to the crime, but she disagrees.
‘I think it’s relevant to the case,’ Copeland said, adding that being convicted of a felony has less implications for an illegal immigrant who can’t vote or buy a gun anyway- as those are rights that are taken away from felons.